The present article includes a comparative study of Islamic approach and western approach about human rights and the general orientation of this review concentrates on Universality and Relativism of human rights. The main question of this article is that what differences exist between Islamic human rights and Western human rights in respect of universality and relativism of human rights. Answering to this question, it should be noted that western approach on human rights claiming universality of this rights and it believes that these rights are ultra-spot and timeless, in spite of the diversity of cultures, ethnicity and religions and thus suppose its innovative human rights extensible elsewhere in the world. Islamic approach on human rights emphasizing Human Nature as a common unity of all humans, believes too in universal ultra-spot and timeless human rights; Nevertheless the practice of Islamic States, in contrast with the imposed western approach, willing to relativism, in order to escape from executing that law. The present article confirming the hypothesis concludes that the difference between approach and practice of Islamic states in this respect is reasonable; because the first is non phenomenological and the second is phenomenological. In adition it criticizes the position of religious intellectualism about the matter.
میرموسوی، سید علی و حقیقت، سید صادق (1388)، مبانی حقوق بشر از دیدگاه اسلام و دیگر مکاتب، تهران: انتشارات پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و اندیشه اسلامی
هاشمی، سید محمد (1384)، حقوق بشر و آزادیهای اساسی، تهران: انتشارات میزان
ب: لاتین
Arzt, Donna E. (1990), “The Application of International Human Rights Law in Islamic States”, Human Rights Quarterly, No. 12
Bielefeldt, Heiner (1995), “Muslim Voices in the Human Rights Debate”, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 17
Dellavalle, Sergio (2010), “Beyond Particularism: Remarks on Some Resent Approaches to the Idea of a Universal Political and Legal Order”, The European Journal of International Law, Vol. 21, No. 3
Donnelly, Jack (May 2007), “The Relative Universality of Human Rights”, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 2
Kabasakal Arat, Zehra F. (2008), “Human Rights Ideology and Dimensions of Power: A Radical Approach to the State, Property and Discrimination”, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 3
Penn, Michael L. and Aditi Malik (2010), “The Protection and Development of the Human Spirit: An Expanded Focus for Human Rights Discourse”, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 2
Perry, Michael J. (1997), “Are Human Rights Universal? The Relativist Challenge and Related Matters”, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 19
Shestack, Jerome J. (1998), “The Philosophic Foundations of Human Rights”, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 20
FallahZade,A and Mousavi,S T . (2016). Islamic Human Rights Compared with Western Human Rights: Universality or Relativism
(Analitical Critique of Religious Intellectualism). Human Rights and Citizenship, 1(1), 57-82. doi: 10.30497/hcr.2016.75775
MLA
FallahZade,A , and Mousavi,S T . "Islamic Human Rights Compared with Western Human Rights: Universality or Relativism
(Analitical Critique of Religious Intellectualism)", Human Rights and Citizenship, 1, 1, 2016, 57-82. doi: 10.30497/hcr.2016.75775
HARVARD
FallahZade A, Mousavi S T. (2016). 'Islamic Human Rights Compared with Western Human Rights: Universality or Relativism
(Analitical Critique of Religious Intellectualism)', Human Rights and Citizenship, 1(1), pp. 57-82. doi: 10.30497/hcr.2016.75775
CHICAGO
A FallahZade and S T Mousavi, "Islamic Human Rights Compared with Western Human Rights: Universality or Relativism
(Analitical Critique of Religious Intellectualism)," Human Rights and Citizenship, 1 1 (2016): 57-82, doi: 10.30497/hcr.2016.75775
VANCOUVER
FallahZade A, Mousavi S T. Islamic Human Rights Compared with Western Human Rights: Universality or Relativism
(Analitical Critique of Religious Intellectualism). Human Rights and Citizenship. 2016;1(1):57-82 (In Persian). doi: 10.30497/hcr.2016.75775