Since the description of "universality" is one of the most important attributes of "human rights" recognized in the present age, the theorists have extensively attempted to analyze the principles of universality of human rights. Moral theories as extra-legal solutions are one the most important directions to achieve this goal in a way that recognizing the human rights norms as moral ones have been the greatest reason for proving the universality of human rights. The examination of moral theories having the capacity of presenting the universal norms indicates the allegations posed in this regard aren’t true; Even the Kant’s moral theory presenting the moral rules as universal and humanistic, in addition not to cover a very important part of the human rights aspects, is faced with many theoretical problems. The research method is analytical.
نقیب زاده، میرعبدالحسین (1380)، در آمدی به فلسفه، تهران: انتشارات طهوری.
کاپالدی، نیکولاس(1381)، میل و فایده گرایی، ترجمه محمد بقایی ماکان، تهران: انتشارات اقبال.
فلسفی، هدایتالله (1374-1375)، «تدوین و اعتلای حقوق بشر در جامعه بینالمللی»، مجله تحقیقات حقوقی (دانشگاه شهید بهشتی)، شماره 16 و 17.
گروس اسپیل، هکتور (1380)، «جهانشمولی حقوق بشر و تنوع فرهنگی»، ترجمه ابراهیم بیگ زاده، مجله تحقیقات حقوقی، شماره 33 و 34، 1380
ب. منابع لاتین:
Gibbard, Allan (1984), “Utilitarianism and Human Rights”, Social Philosophy and Policy, Vol. 1
Fagan, Andrew (2016), “Human Rights”, in: Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, visited June 2016, www.iep.utm.edu/hum-rts/
L. Stevenson (1963), "Facts & Values", New Haven, Yale University Press
Campbell, Kenneth (2013), "Legal Rights", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2013 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/legal-rights/.
Gowans, Chris (2007), "Moral Relativism", in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2007 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-relativism/
Henkin, Loui,.”The Universality of the Concept of Human Right”,The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, No. 506
Kant, Immanuel ()2005, “The Moral Law: Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals”, Translated by Herbert James Paton, Psychology Press
Donnelly, Jack (1984), “Cultural Relativism and Universal Human Rights”, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 6, No. 4
Budd, John (2005), James G. Scoville, “The Ethics of Human Resources and Industrial Relations”, Cornell University Press
Fletcher, Joseph (1967), “Moral responsibility: situation ethics at work”, London: Westminster Press
Raz, Joseph (2007), “Human Rights without Foundations”, Oxford Legal Studies Research, Paper No. 14/2007.
MacIntyre, Alasdair (1981), After Virtue, London: Gerald Duckworth & Co.
Forst, Rainer (2010), “The Justification of Human Rights and the Basic Right to Justification: A Reflexive Approach”, Ethics, Vol. 120, No. 4
Olson, Robert (1965), “The Morality of Self-Interest”, New York, Harcourt
Campbell, Tom (2005), “Moral Dimensions of Human Rights”, in: Human Rights and the Moral Responsibilities of Corporate and Public Sector Organisations, Tom Campbell & Seumas Miller (Ed.), Springer
Emrani,S. (2016). Are the Human Rights Morally Universal?
(Critique of Moral foundations of the Universal Human Rights). Human Rights and Citizenship, 1(1), 83-104. doi: 10.30497/hcr.2016.75776
MLA
Emrani,S. . "Are the Human Rights Morally Universal?
(Critique of Moral foundations of the Universal Human Rights)", Human Rights and Citizenship, 1, 1, 2016, 83-104. doi: 10.30497/hcr.2016.75776
HARVARD
Emrani S. (2016). 'Are the Human Rights Morally Universal?
(Critique of Moral foundations of the Universal Human Rights)', Human Rights and Citizenship, 1(1), pp. 83-104. doi: 10.30497/hcr.2016.75776
CHICAGO
S. Emrani, "Are the Human Rights Morally Universal?
(Critique of Moral foundations of the Universal Human Rights)," Human Rights and Citizenship, 1 1 (2016): 83-104, doi: 10.30497/hcr.2016.75776
VANCOUVER
Emrani S. Are the Human Rights Morally Universal?
(Critique of Moral foundations of the Universal Human Rights). Human Rights and Citizenship, 2016; 1(1): 83-104. doi: 10.30497/hcr.2016.75776